Application types
New degree programmes and offerings, separate modules
Please note that the description is primarily aimed at applications for new degree programmes and offerings, but that the method can also be used for other application types. Applications for new degree programmes and offerings are subject to the most extensive documentation requirements. Therefore, the use of the method must reflect the documentation requirements associated with the individual application types and associated guides. Examples from different application types are listed to the extent that the method has been used in specific AU applications.
Purpose
Quantitatively document the needs of prospective employers for the almost finalised degree programme
Target group
A broad selection of relevant prospective employers covering the various fields of employment for graduates. Can also be used for consulting with the chair of the body of external co-examiners.
How
Telephone interviews/online surveys based on the most central questions about the need for the degree programme with closed response categories. Open-ended questions may be added to allow respondents to provide input.
Prospective employers must provide an opinion on the need for the degree programme compared to related programmes, and it is therefore a good idea to include a brief description of the degree programme and links to specific related degree programmes.
When
Once the qualification profile and structure of the degree programme have been decided – as late as possible in order to document present needs.
A survey can also be done earlier in the process to get a broader overview of needs in connection with the development of the programme. In that case, we recommend repeating the process if there has been a long development period (e.g. 1 year) and/or if major changes have been made.
Pros
Quantifiable documentation for application. Can be used directly to document and substantiate estimates. Reaches a wide range of prospective employers. Possibility of obtaining more in-depth input via open-ended questions.
Cons
Not suitable for the dialogue phase.